Wednesday, 5 October 2011

EAC Diyun called back 22 disqualified Chakma students to school

By Tejang Chakma


ABOUT a month after their names were deleted from the school admission register, smiles of 22 Chakma students of Government Secondary School Diyun under Changlang district of Arunachal Pradesh are back after they were called back to school.

In September 2011, the Extra-Assistant Commissioner (EAC), Diyun circle issued an order allowing the 22 Chakma students to attend their classes forthwith. The order came forth after a two-member team of Arunachal Pradesh Chakma Students’ Union (APCSU) headed by its President called on the EAC. The students’ body took up the issue since it came to light to save the future of these students.

The EAC revoked its earlier order No.DYN/DEV/-3/2009-10/505-09 dated 24 August 2011 asking the school authority to terminate the admission of the Chakma students studying in IXth standard in the school. The Headmaster In-Charge in his letter dated 27 August 2011 informed the EAC of deletion of the names of the students from the school admission register. This harsh step was taken after the EAC found that all the 22 students were students of a private school in Bijoypur village which falls under another circle namely Bordumsa. This private school has been using Government Middle School, Dumpani village under Diyun circle as a feeder school for its Class VIII students. These 22 students had appeared in the final examination in this school during  academic session 2010-11 and successfully passed out. Subsequently, these students were admitted in Class IX at Diyun secondary school in this academic session on production of Class VIII pass certificates from Middle School, Dumpani village. 

However, the EAC stated that no prior approval was obtained from the local authority to get the feeder status and declared the admission of these students as illegal.  Since then the fate of these students’ was hanging in balance. Five of the 22 students were girls.

The issue was sorted out following talks held with the EAC and Students’ Union members. However, the order was accompanied with a rider that these 22 students will have to shift to other schools in the next academic session. 

Yet, these students are happy to be back to school. 

Names of the 22 students are given in the table below.

Sl No
Students’ Name
Father’s Name
1
Miss S Chakma
Shri K. D. Chakma
2
Master   D. D. Chakma
Shri Lokhindar Chakma
3
Master   S. L.Chakma
Shri J. M. Chakma
4
Miss N. Chakma
Shri S. K. Chakma
5
Master   S. K. Chakma
Shri B. M. Chakma
6
Master   C. Chakma
Shri S. K. Chakma
7
Master   A. Chakma
Shri A. K. Chakma
8
Master L. J. Chakma
Shri S. L. Chakma
9
Master   A. M. Chakma
Shri A. S. Chakma
10
Miss G. Chakma
Shri D. D. Chakma
11
Master   A. Chakma
Shri D. C. Chakma
12
Master   R. Chakma
Shri K. D. Chakma
13
Master  J. K. Chakma
Shri N. K. Chakma
14
Master   S. B. Chakma
Shri B. G. Chakma
15
Master   S. C. Chakma
Shri K. Chakma
16
Master   K. Chakma
Shri J. K. Chakma
17
Miss B. Chakma
Shri B. S. Chakma
18
Master   B. K. Chakma
Shri M. D. Chakma
19
Master R. J. Chakma
Shri R. C. Chakma
20
Master   M. R. Chakma
Shri S. Chakma
21
Master   S. M. Chakma
Shri S. R. Chakma
22
Miss C. S. Chakma
Shri J. R. Chakma

Tuesday, 4 October 2011

High Power Committee under MHA to hold First Meeting to discuss Chakma-Hajong issues on 17th October

By Tejang Chakma


The High Power Committee constituted by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India is going to hold its first meeting on 17 October 2011 at Banquet Hall, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh at 2.30 pm. The meeting will discuss various issues relating to Chakmas and Hajongs including grant of citizenship and resettlement.

The following is the "Public Notice" issued by the state government of Arunachal Pradesh on 27 September 2011 inviting all the members and special invitees of the Committee to attend the meet. 

Saturday, 1 October 2011

Longding: No. 17th district of Arunachal Pradesh

By Tejang Chakma


On 26 September 2011, Longding becomes the 17 district of Arunachal Pradesh. The new district curved out of insurgency-hit Tirap district, is located 54 Kms off Khonsa, the HQs of Tirap district. Longding which shares boundary with Nagaland and Myanmar is inhabited by the Wancho tribe who are mainly dependent on jhum (shifting) cultivation.

The new district was created with the state Legislative Assembly passing the Arunachal Pradesh (Re-Organization of Districts) (amendment) Bill, 2011 with voice votes. The district will comprise of administrative units of Longding, Kanubari, Pongchao, Wakka and Pumao Lawnu.

The total population of the district is estimated to be about 60,000 people. Few other districts in the state also have low population. 

In June 2010, the state government headed by the then Chief Minister Dorjee Khandu constituted a high power committee to finalise the boundary and creation of the district following approval by the state cabinet on its meeting in August 2009. In August 2010, the Committee submitted its report with recommendation for creation of the district.

State’s Chief Minister Jarbom Gamlin, who is also the Minister in-charge of District Administration, while moving the bill justified the creation of the district on the ground that the area lags far behind in a developmental aspects and appealed the members to support the bill. The Chief Minister added “The creation of the new district will meet the aspiration and long felt demand of the people and also enable the government to run the administration effectively to achieve speedy development in all fronts.”

There was little opposition to the Bill. Earlier, Congress member Newlai Tingkhatra, who represents Kanubari constituency, expressed apprehension that the new district would create tension between the communities over distribution of villages and demarcation of boundary.

289 persons killed by Naxals in six months of 2011

By Tejang Chakma


The Naxalites or the Maoists have killed 289 persons in the first six months of 2011. This indicates that at an average of 48 persons have lost their lives every month or more than one person per day.


On 7 August 2011, Shri Jitendra Singh, Minister of State in the Ministry of Home Affairs in written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha stated that 208 civilians and 89 security forces were killed by the Naxalites in 912 incidents from 1 January 2011-30 June 2011.  The highest number of the killing was reported from Jharkhand with 66 followed by Chhattisgarh (52); West Bengal (31); Maharashtra (21); Bihar (19); Orissa (16); and Andhra Pradesh (3). Most of the civilians were also killed in Jharkhand (66) followed by Chhattisgarh (52). Four Naxalites incidents were reported from Madhya Pradesh, fortunately there was no report of any casualty.  

In 2010, 1005 persons, including 720 civilians and 285 security forces, were killed by the Naxalites in as many as 2212 incidents.

On 13 September 2011, Union Home Minister P Chidambaram called the “Naxalism a bigger challenge than terrorism or insurgency.”

Majority of the civilians killed were accused of being police informers. The Naxalites have been responsible for brutal killing of their hostages after abduction. Often the hostages were killed by slitting their throats or beheading or subjected to torture through the so called Jan Adalats (people’s courts) in full public view to instill fear among the people.

In April 2010, the Asian Centre for Human Rights (ACHR), a leading human rights NGO in India, has termed the Maoists as the “worst human rights violators” among all armed groups in the country. In its report titled Torture in India 2010, ACHR stated “often these killings were authorized by Maoist ‘people’s courts or Jan Adalats.”

In fact, the number of Jan Adalats has increased. According to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, the number of Jan Adalats increased to 48 in 2010 (up to 31 August 2010) from 38 in the corresponding period in 2009. The number of persons killed in Jan Adalats also increased to 21 from 11 during the same period.

Saturday, 24 September 2011

Arunachal: Dismal state of education

By Tejang Chakma

OVER four decades have elapsed since the Chakmas were settled in Arunachal Pradesh by the Government of India under a definite plan of rehabilitation. However, they remained stateless till date. The lack of citizenship has been the primary reason for their pathetic socio-economic conditions.

The state of education, which is generally seen as the foundation for the development and progress of any society, remained grim in Chakma inhabited areas in the state. This was largely due to state government’s repressive policy against the Chakmas since 1980s in the wake of the anti-foreigner agitation in Assam. In 1994, schools were withdrawn in Chakma areas in Changlang, Lohit and Papumpare districts, where the Chakmas inhabit and Chakma children were denied admission in other schools outside the Chakma areas.

Subsequently, these schools were opened especially with the launch of the Sarva Shiksha Abiyan (SSA), a flagship programme of the Central government for universalisation of elementary education.

The state government can also no longer deprive the Chakma children of elementary education which has become a “fundamental right” with the enactment of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act (RTE), 2009.

Yet, access especially to secondary and higher secondary education continued to be difficult for the Chakma children. 

No secondary schools

There is no denying the fact that most of the Chakma inhabited villages presently have schools following the launch of the Sarva Shiksha Abiyan. But, these schools provide education only up to elementary level. More and more Chakma students are passing out of elementary education every year and consequently pressure on secondary education is increasingly being felt due to lack of secondary schools in the Chakma inhabited areas in all the three districts of Changlang, Lohit and Papumpare. 

The situation is worst in Changlang district where majority of the Chakmas live. Presently, the total population of the Chakmas, including the Hajong community, is about 46,691 in the district according to a Special Survey Report of the state government. The Chakmas inhabit in four Circles namely Bordumsa, Diyun, Kharsang and Miao under Changlang district. However, there is only one secondary school in Diyun circle for the Chakma population of these four  circles. There is no secondary school for the Chakmas in Bordumsa, Kharsang and Miao circles despite having substantial population. According to the 2001 census, the Chakma population is more than 11,000 in two circles of Bordumsa and Miao alone. While secondary schools outside Chakma areas are not accessible to the Chakma students.

In the absence of secondary schools and denial of admission in higher schools outside their areas, the Chakma students from Bordumsa, Kharsang and Miao circles are forced to seek admission at Diyun secondary school every year. As a result, overcrowding remains a recurring problem at Diyun school, thereby seriously affecting the quality of education.

Recently, the Chakma students from outside Diyun circle were denied admission to Diyun secondary school allegedly on the ground of overcrowding and other unfounded reasons. At least 22 Chakma students from Bordumsa circle, who were given admission initially, were asked not to further attend classes during this academic session. Presently their fates hang in balance. 

This problem will continue to be felt unless secondary schools are established in Chakma areas outside Diyun circle. The opening of secondary school in these areas will help Diyun school to maintain its intake capacity, thereby reducing overcrowding. Moreover, the Chakma areas outside Diyun circle deserve secondary schools considering the presence of substantial population and the long distance of Diyun school from their areas. 

Non-implementation of RMSA in Chakma areas

During 2008 - 2009, the Centre launched the Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA) for the universalisation of secondary education in India. The main aim of the RMSA is to make secondary education of good quality available, accessible and affordable to all young persons in the age group 15-16 years for secondary education and 16-18 years for higher secondary education. The main aim of the RMSA is to make secondary education of good quality available.

Under RMSA, secondary school has to be provided within 5 km of any habitation and 7-10 km for higher secondary schools. In other words, it suggests that the Chakmas outside of Diyun circle can demand higher schools or upgrade of the existing middle schools to secondary level under the RMSA, while the Chakmas of Diyun circle can insist for upgradation of Diyun secondary school to higher secondary level. 

However, it is highly unlikely that the state government will provide higher schools or upgrade the existing schools due to its repressive policy against the Chakmas. Further, the state government will take the advantage of the fact that secondary education is not constitutionally compulsory unlike the elementary education which can be challenged in court.

Lack of higher secondary school and increasing dropout rates

Another issue of concern is the lack of higher secondary school for the Chakmas in the entire Changlang district. The upgradation of the Diyun secondary school to higher secondary level is a long pending demand of the Chakmas. Yet, several pleas of the Chakmas with the authorities have fallen on deaf ears. The government higher secondary school at Innao, located in nonChakma area, is the only higher secondary school in the entire Diyun circle. Although, admission is given to students passing out from Diyun school, only few actually gets admissions. Students who have the financial capacity take admission outside the state such as Assam, Delhi, etc. But, the majority of them, who are poor, have no option but to discontinue their studies. Exact figure on the drop-outs does not exist, but it is estimated that 1/3rd of students, mostly girls, were forced to discontinue education every year.

School drop-outs marry early, ends up as unskilled labourers, domestic servants and few even get involve in antisocial activities. Every year, many of these drop-outs, including the girls, are going outside the state such as Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, etc in search of petty jobs. They work in hostile conditions and remain extremely vulnerable to abuse. 

Pathetic condition of Diyun Secondary School

The Diyun Secondary School, constructed by the Chakmas themselves on a self-help basis, is the only secondary level school meant for a population of over 46,000 Chakmas, including the Hajong community, in Changlang district. In the absence of any secondary school for the Chakmas in the whole Changlang district, this school has to accommodate not only students from Diyun circle but also students passing out elementary education from outside Diyun circle every year. This results in overcrowding and affects the quality of education.

There are two higher schools outside Chakma areas in Diyun circle, a secondary school at Sompoi and a higher secondary school at Innao. But, these schools are not easily accessible to the Chakma students. This is another reason for overcrowding at Diyun school. On an average a teacher has to teach more than 100 students especially in Class 9th and 10th standard. The negative impact on the quality of education in Diyun school can be measured from the poor results of class 10th students during academic session 2010-11. Out of the 132 students appeared in class 10th only 21 students had passed, while the rest were declared Eligible for Improvement of Performance (EIOP). In other words, they have failed.

No doubt, admitting large number of students at the school will affect the quality of education. But as the adage goes, “something is better than nothing.” this school is the only ray of hope for hundreds of poor Chakma students in the absence of higher schools. With creation of additional rooms, the problem of overcrowding can be sorted out to some extent. There is no lack of fund. The Ministry of Minority Affairs, Government of India has already sanctioned grant for construction of school buildings for Diyun Secondary school under the Multi Sectoral Development Programme (MsDP) recently. The first installment was released in 2010 but the state government is yet to start construction of infrastructure of the school. 

This article is first published in SOJAAK, The Chakma Community Magazine, Issue 2:: September, 2011


Wednesday, 31 August 2011

Undue financial benefit given by CADC to a Contractor: CAG Report

By Tejang Chakma


The other day, as I was looking for some materials for research related work, I came across a report by Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India which revealed undue financial benefit of over Rs. 3 crore given by Chakma Autonomous District Council, Mizoram to a contractor. Similar news stories are reported earlier but it appears that this news is hitherto unknown to the general public.

According to the CAG’s latest “Audit Report (Civil), Mizoram for the Year 2009-2010”, the Chakma Autonomous District Council (CADC) paid advance of Rs. 3.61 crore to a contractor from the public exchequer in violation prescribed procedures of Central Public Work Department works manual and financial rules. This has resulted in undue financial benefit to the contractor together with loss of interest.

In April 2010, scrutiny of records of the Executive Secretary, CADC by the CAG disclosed that out of the available funds of the Non Lapsable Central Pool of Resources (NLCPR) CADC in January 2008 started implementation of Project “Upgradation of Parva-I to Semensora Road in Mizoram” funded by Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region (DoNER) at the total cost of Rs. 12.26 crore. The state government released Rs. 7.56 crore to the CADC in two installments in September 2007 and May 2009 respectively along with loan component of Rs. 41.99 lakh in February 2008.

On 29 January 2008, the CADC’s Selection Committee selected an Aizawl-based contractor based on lowest tendered rates. On the next day, a work order was issued to the contractor for the execution of the work at the tendered amount of Rs. 12.02 crore specifying 18 months as the scheduled time of completion of the work. Based on the applications received from the contractor, the CADC unauthorisedly released advances of Rs. 3.61 crore (mobilization advance of Rs. 2.40 crore and advance of Rs. 1.21 crore for plant and machinery) to the contractor.

This was against the permissible advance. The CAG found that against the permissible advance of Rs. 1.80 crore (mobilization advance of Rs. 1.20 crore and Rs. 0.60 crore for advance for purchase of plant and machineries), the CADC unauthorisedly sanctioned and disbursed a total advance of Rs. 3.61 crore, which resulted in excess payment of advance of Rs. 1.81 crore with undue benefit to the contractor.

The CAG report further revealed that the mobilistion advance of Rs. 2.40 crore was released to the contractor without obtaining any bank guarantee and without incorporating any provision for realization of 10 percent simple interest in the sanction orders. This is not all. The CADC did not obtain any documents in support of purchase of new plant and machinery before releasing advance of Rs. 1.21 crore. Neither did CADC could able to produce details of deductions with regard to recovery of both the advances as of April 2010.

Consequently, the CADC failed in ensuring safeguard its interest. The CAG report revealed that the CADC could not even initiate any action to fix responsibility against the erring officials as of January 2011.

The matter was reported to the government in July 2010. In its reply in August 2010, the government stated that action was being taken with the concerned District Council. However, no further reply was submitted as of January 2011.

The CADC is not alone. The CAG also reported unauthorized diversion of recurring grants of Rs. 1.53 crore by the Lai Autonomous District Council (LADC). The unspent grant was unauthorisedly utilized towards expenditure other than salary during 2007-2008. During 2007-2008, Rs.24.52 crore was released as non-recurring grant-in-aid to the Council under Non-Plan Sector for meeting the salary component of General Secretariat (Rs. 9.72 crore) and Education Department. The grant was released with the clear stipulation that it should not be diverted for any other purpose other than for which it was allocated.

In its reply, the Council stated that they have utilized the entire fund for the purpose it was meant for. However, the claim of the Council was rejected as the Annual Accounts approved by the Council and submitted during 2007-2008 clearly reflected non-plan expenditure.  

Monday, 8 August 2011

Why NLFT is the worst militant outfit in the northeast India?

By Tejang Chakma


According to the Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 in non-international armed conflict situation, each Party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a minimum, the following provisions:

      “(1) Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed ' hors de combat ' by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.
To this end, the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons:
(a) violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;
(b) taking of hostages;
(c) outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment;
(d) the passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.”

Further, Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts of 8 June 1977, among others, prohibits “(e) outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, rape, enforced prostitution and any form of indecent assault; and (g) pillage.”

Even a cursory reading of the provisions of the Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and its Optional Protocol suggests that the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), a militant outfit in Tripura, made a mockery of the provisions.

The National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT) was formed on 12 March 1989 with the purported objective to establish an ‘independent’ Tripura through an armed struggle and furtherance of a ‘distinct and independent identity’. Since inception, the NLFT suffered from internal conflicts owing to various issues including leadership differences, lavish lifestyles of senior leadership, among others, resulting in splits. 

The NLFT was banned in April 1997 under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, due to its involvement in terrorist and subversive activities. For furtherance of their so-called objective, a report indicated that the Nayanbasi Jamatiya faction of the NLFT and another outfit All Tripura Tiger Force (ATTF) joined hands under code name "Operation Roukhala (deportation)" purportedly to ‘drive out’ Bengali immigrants settled in Tripura after 15 October 1949. Many non-tribals were killed and abducted by the NLFT, while political activists, irrespective of their ethnic origins, belonging to ruling CPI-M were repeatedly targeted.

Violence is the only objective of the NLFT. Non-tribals or tribals, all are equally targeted. The abuses committed by NLFT are endless. From the beginning, the NLFT has shown scant respect for international humanitarian law. They engaged themselves in violent acts which included kidnappings, extortion, killings including mass murders, rapes, and bombings. 

The brutal face of NLFT can be seen from its high number of serious crime against women and children. In fact, the NLFT is worst among its other counterparts in the north east region in this regard. There were several instances, when women and children were raped, killed, and subjected to ill-treatment. For example, six Chakma tribal women, including two minor girls, were gang raped by the NLFT militants in front of their family members at Baisyaram Karbaripara, a Chakma dominated tribal village in Chhwamanu in Dhalai district in March 2004. The NLFT was even accused of producing pornographic films by using its female cadres to funds its terror activities and that the female cadres were sexually abused in the camps by their male counterparts were confirmed by the female surrendered cadres.

Over the years, several of its cadres realized that violence can never be a solution and started surrendering. However, the NLFT targeted its surrendered cadres and killed many of them including their innocent family members in retaliation. This did not, however, deter them from surrendering to lead a peaceful life. As its strength started dwindling due to surrender of its cadres, the NLFT has increasingly been resorting to kidnapping of innocent poor people, including tribals for whom they claim to represent, for extortion to fund its terror activities and as a desperate attempt to make its presence felt. In fact, kidnapping for ransom by the NLFT has become a common occurrence in Tripura. The recent kidnapping of 8 Chakma tribals on July 19, 2011, whose whereabouts are still unknown, for ransom is an example. On its part, the state government's episodic response failed to stop the recurring menace. 

The NLFT has no public sympathy; they are despised by all communities, including the tribals. They are the worst militant outfit in the northeast region and they have no words called "Human Rights" in their dictionary.